Nutcase Cleric

U.S Cleric says; Islamists are elated by revolts,

WASHINGTON U.S.A, So called cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, the
Yemeni-“American” cleric who is a top propagandist for Al Qaeda, broke his
silence on the uprisings in the Arab world, claiming that Islamist extremists
had gleefully watched the success of protest movements against governments they
had long despised (London Times, One dictatorship for another repression out-dated
extreme Muslim one? is it better the devil you know? than you don’t no?)

“The mujahedeen around the world are going through a moment
of elation,” Awlaki wrote in a new issue of the “English-language” Qaeda
magazine Inspire, “and I wonder whether the West is aware of the upsurge of
mujahedeen activity in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Yemen, Arabia, Algeria and
Morocco?”

Sir Michael Black-Feather the English first minister said; Awlaki’s
four-page essay, titled “The Tsunami of Change,” is among a handful of
statements by Al Qaeda’s leaders countering the common view among Western
analysts that the terrorist network looks irrelevant at a time of change
unprecedented in the modern Middle East. In ousting the rulers of Tunisia and
Egypt and threatening other Arab leaders, a core of secular-leaning,
demonstrators have called for democracy and generally avoided violence, and are
all at odds with Al Qaeda’s creed as it tries to install rigid Islamist rule
across the world which just won’t ever happen, a few nut-cases poking sticks in
wasp’s nest’s won’t change this world, the AL Qaeda creed live in the dark ages
in a time that won’t ever be seen again, and is only seen by those delusional
to see it within their own minds, and impose their derision’s (Dictatorship) on
others .

In an audio statement this month, the Egyptian deputy to
Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri, pleaded with the Egyptians who toppled
President Hosni Mubarak to shun the United States, reject democracy and embrace
Islam as the answer to their problems. Arguing that Al Qaeda deserved some
indirect credit for the uprisings, he said the United States’ willingness to
drop its support for Mr. Mubarak and other authoritarian leaders was a “direct
result” of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Awlaki’s essay is more colloquial and confident,
asserting that the momentous change in Arab countries left Western leaders
“confused, worried, and unhappy for the departure of some of its closest and
most reliable friends.”

He quotes American commentators who describe the uprisings
as a refutation of Al Qaeda, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
Clinton’s assertion last month that “the success of peaceful protests has
discredited the extremists.”

Mr. Awlaki, who is thought to be hiding in Yemen, argues
that such conclusions are premature. “The outcome doesn’t have to be an Islamic
government for us to consider what is occurring to be a step in the right
direction,” he writes.

By “breaking the barriers of fear” and toppling leaders who
protected “American imperial interests,” he asserts, the uprisings should play
to the long-term advantage of Al Qaeda’s philosophy. He points to Yemen and
Libya, where embattled leaders are clinging to power, as places where turmoil
could open possibilities for jihadists to organize.

Awlaki’s statement comes as some American officials have
expressed anxiety about just that possibility. In Libya, an American military
official said this week that there were “flickers” of intelligence suggesting
that Qaeda or Hezbollah operatives were among the rebels fighting Col. Muammar
el-Qaddafi. And in Yemen, President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s weakening grip on
power could take pressure off Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

Expressing hope that revolution will spread from Yemen to
Saudi Arabia, Mr. Awlaki asks, “Doesn’t the West realize how the jihadi work
would just take off as soon as the regimes of the Gulf start crumbling?”

Sir Michael” said the likes of Qaeda propagandists are
“consummate opportunists no matter what happens, these half-wits will try to
spin it to their benefit.” But he said several influential Qaeda theorists
appear to believe that the departure of authoritarian leaders will prove
advantageous.

“Al Qaeda recognizes how marginal they are on this,” Sir
Michael said. “But it could open the kind of operating space they’ve wanted for
a long time when people lose hope and leeches like Qaeda move in and offer hope
which is not as it seems because people are lost the grab at it, only when it
sinks in dose one realise it’s not what one really wanted, but the infection is
already there and needs the skills of a good surgeon to remove it not a tank
driver?.”

Inspire magazine, five issues of which have been posted on
militant Web sites, is believed to be the work primarily of Samir Khan, a
Saudi-born American who grew up in Queens and North Carolina before moving to
Yemen in 2009.

It is a slick, graphics-heavy, irreverent publication aimed
at young Muslims attracted to the extremist cause; the latest issue includes an
invitation to readers to e-mail questions to Awlaki and a two-page primer on
how to use an AK automatic rifle.

Khan himself contributed to inspire an appeal to Egyptians
not to stop after overthrowing Mr. Mubarak but to impose religious rule.

“The question now comes: what do you do if your government
decides not to rule by Shariah?” he asks, referring to Islamic law. “Who does
your loyalty go to? The state or Allah?

Sir Michael said; God/Allah gave all of mankind free will,
which all these extremist Muslims seem to have forgotten, or just don’t understand
the true worlds of God, having their minds infected by false so called clerics.

God does not inflict his rules/laws on to any man, because
you all have free will, either to follow his words or not to follow them, “But
it’s not up to any of mankind to thrust Gods/Allah words on to any men in his
name, only God himself has this right? Extremist in their own rule of law,
which are not Gods laws, are truly blasphemous and their laws are full of blasphemy
and hate.

The West double standards over Libya will help Islamists

After the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979, the West
nervously waited for similar uprisings in the "Arab Street."
Practically nothing changed in the Arab world in the last 30 years. Yet, since
the beginning of 2011, events in the Middle East have been unfolding at an
unrest pace.

We are only in March, and already regimes in Tunisia and
Egypt have been overthrown by the peoples' demonstrations; the uprising in
Libya has forced the international community to take military action against
Muammar Gadhafi; Yemen is witnessing bloody chaos; Syria is showing signs of
serious unrest and Saudi Arabia intervened in Bahrain to crush the opposition.

The rapidly changing Middle East.

So far, none of the peoples' movements have been directed
against the West. It was not "Western imperialism" but a combination
of domestic political repression, youth unemployment, heightened expectations
and socio-economic deprivation that mobilized Arab masses.

Unfortunately, this positive dynamic may soon come to an
end.

In the eyes of many Arabs in the region, a deeply troubling
Western double standard is emerging. Bahrain, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Yemen

In the eyes of many Arabs in the region, a deeply troubling
Western double standard is emerging. Many in the region are asking a simple
question: Why is the West willing to intervene in Libya, while there is total
Western silence about the brutal suppression of dissidents in Bahrain? (OIL is
the only reason the West gets involved anywhere, or when some country has something
they want? There is always a darker reason why)

The West is very selective in lending its support to the
"Arab Spring."

As Sir Michael Black-Feather the English first minister had
warned us: "The lesson that many are drawing is that two distinct
standards apply to Arab citizens' rights. In countries like Libya, Egypt and
Tunisia, the world will accept or actively support constitutional changes that
citizens of those countries demand. In other Arab countries, like Bahrain,
Saudi the rights of citizens are secondary to wider energy and security needs
or the oil."

The fact that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates sent
troops to Bahrain clearly shows that these energy-producing conservative Arab
countries are deeply worried about a spill-over of unrest into their own
countries and the fact that the British prime minister David Cameron when  out to Saudi with his corrupted of weapons
dealer’s tells us the other story?.

There is also the fear of Iran looming on the horizon.
Through its Shiite proxies, Iran can support opposition forces in Yemen and
Bahrain. Bahrain has a Shiite majority and Yemen a significant Shiite minority.
There is therefore a strong undertone of Sunni-Shiite tension behind Saudi
Arabia and the U.A.E's action Sir Michael said.

He went on to say; the presence of al-Qaida in Yemen is
another complicating factor about what would happen in case of a total collapse
of the Yemeni state. And of course, the most difficult question to answer is
what will happen when a similar uprising takes place in Saudi Arabia would we
see British troops backing the Saudi’s as like Kuwait?

But such Western security concerns don't change the question
that millions of Arab youth are asking: Why should the U.N. principle of
"responsibility to protect" apply only to countries like Libya and
leave Bahrain and Yemen out in the cold?

Surely all regimes in the region are not equally brutal.
Bahrain, Saudi Arabia or Yemen may appear to have more legitimacy than
Gadhafi's regime in Libya, yet the Yemeni and Bahraini governments have shown
no mercy against protesters in recent weeks.

The double standard is also obvious in the Saudi behaviour.
The Saudis have backed intervention in Libya to help the rebels at the same
moment as they have sent troops into Bahrain to help suppress a rebellion.

Many in Bahrain -- in fact the majority of the country given
the Shiite demographics -- see the Saudi move as an "occupation" by
foreign forces.

The West has so far been very lucky about the absence of
Islamists in mass demonstrations for democracy and human rights in the region
Sir Michael said, Yet, unless the British, Europeans and the United States
become more consistent in their support for democracy in all the region’s, soon
it will be radical Islamists and enemies of the West that will have the upper
hand in mass demonstrations it’s there waiting to happen?

And if I had been give the post in the British
cabinet as a senior policy adviser? I would have told this British government to
keep out of the affairs of all the Arab world’s with the means of any military
actions, they have to sort out their own differences, we cannot support one
country with military actions without support all of the countries or can we? Our
best path would to be act as a guide, but the British government is so
corrupted itself within? what we could teach the already corrupted.  

Labour MP Jim Devine was jailed for 16 months

Labour MP Jim Devine jailed for 16 months over expenses

Now an Ex-Labour MP Jim Devine was jailed for 16 months for
fraudulently claiming £8,385 in expenses.

Devine was last month found guilty of using false invoices
for cleaning and printing work.

The Labour MP for Livingston, 57, is the third current or
former British MP to be jailed for fiddling their expenses, but was the first
to stand trial.

The English judge, Mr Justice Saunders, said he "set
about defrauding the public purse in a calculated and deliberate way".

He was sentenced to 16 months on each of two counts to run
concurrently. He was cleared of a third count, relating to £360.

Passing sentence at the Old Bailey, Judge Saunders said:
"These offences constituted a gross breach of trust which, along with
others, had had the effect of causing serious damage to the reputation of
Parliament.

"Mr Devine made his false claims at a time when he well
knew the damage that was being caused to Parliament by the expenses scandal but
he carried on regardless."

He said cleaning and maintenance work claimed for by Devine
was either not done at all or not paid for by Devine, and that invoices
submitted for printing work were "entirely bogus".

The judge dismissed as false Devine's claim in court that
another MP had told him what he did was "accepted practice".

Devine had been "lying in significant parts of the
evidence that he gave", the judge said.

But, Judge Saunders added, his crime was less serious than
that of former Labour MP David Chaytor, who was jailed for 18 months after
admitting falsely claiming more than £22,000 of English taxpayers' money for
rent and IT work, and this had been taken into account.

Chaytor last month lost an appeal to have his sentenced
reduced. Former Labour MP Eric Illsley was jailed for 12 months last year after
pleading guilty to £14,000 in expenses fraud.

And Tory peer Lord Taylor of Warwick awaits sentencing after
being convicted by a jury in January of fraudulently claiming more than £11,000
for overnight subsistence and travel.

Devine's lawyer said he would probably serve eight months -
but could get out in four with good behaviour.

Devine had denied "wholly deliberate deceit" in
submitting his Commons expenses, claiming he was advised by another Labour MP
and by expenses officials at the Commons Fees Office, that he was allowed to
use money in his communications allowance to cover staff costs.

In mitigation, Devine's lawyer said the fraud had been
"entirely out of character" and prison would "bear heavily on
him" as he suffers high blood pressure and has lost his reputation as well
as his 30-year political career.

Devine was declared bankrupt last month, following a
separate hearing at Livingston Sheriff Court.

The insolvency order was made after he failed to pay his
former office manager Marion Kinley £35,000 for unfair dismissal.

Last year an employment tribunal heard how he bullied Miss
Kinley and made up stories to justify firing her.

During his expenses trial, Devine claimed Miss Kinley paid
herself more than £5,000 from his staffing allowance without his knowledge by
forging his signature - an allegation his legal team now concedes was not true.

Speaking to the London Times after Devine was jailed; Miss
Kinley said he was a "Walter Mitty" character who "always
exaggerated everything".

"He has bare-faced lied about people just to cover his
own back," she added.

Devine, a former psychiatric nurse and union organiser, was
chairman of the Scottish Labour Party in the 1990s. He later succeeded Robin
Cook as MP for Livingston following the former foreign secretary's death.

He was barred from standing again as a Labour candidate
after the expenses allegations emerged - but he continued to claim for
household costs even after he was charged it’s good to be a British MP, you get
all your bills paid petrol, diesel, food, cleaning, ect,ect,ect all paid for by
English tax payers.

Great Britain? Or the United Kingdom? There is “No such

Great Britain is/was the term used for the island containing
the contiguous nations of England, Scotland and Wales.

Great Britain is only used to distinguish Britain from
Brittania Minor, or Brittany, in France.

The term "Great Britain" was officially used only
after King James I (who was also James VI of Scotland) acceded to the throne of
England and Wales in 1603, styling/calling himself King of Great Britain,
although legislative union between Scotland and England did not take place
until 1707 so the true fact is there is no such country called Great Britain
but only a name given by a King to himself.

England, Scotland and Wales together with the province of
Northern Ireland, form this delusional country officially known as "The
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" or simply the United
Kingdom.

The United Kingdom came into being in 1801 following the
Irish Union, although the greater part of Ireland gained independence in 1921
to form the Irish Republic (or Eire). The majority of the people in Northern
Ireland have wished to remain part of the U.K., although a minority wish
unification with the Irish Republic.

The term "UK" is sometimes inaccurately used by
some British natives of England and those outside our country (England) to
refer to England as the United Kingdom. (United it is not)

Natives of England the (English) find being called part of the
U.K. offensive, so it is best avoided! the term being called "British"
is also not acceptable to the English, the use of being British although has to
be used with care and sensitivity in Northern Ireland, where one section of the
community would be happy being so-described, whereas the other would most
definitely regard themselves as "Irish".

The British Isles is used more loosely to describe the main
island of England together with its associated islands (including the Isle of
Man). It has no legal significance.

The Channel Islands, which include the independent States of
Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney and Sark, are the only remaining components of the
"Duchy of Normandy" which still belong to the English Crown.

Where a "nation" is defined as "a
body of people marked off by common descent, language, culture or historical
tradition" [Chambers Everyday Dictionary] (English-England) England is and
always will be its own country and not the UK nor GB being as they don’t really
exist in a defined nation or body of people with

Lawless England under British soft laws on gangs

Five year old little girl gets shot in Stockwell shop, while
British Prime Minister David Cameron sleeps safe in his bed at night in.

A five-year-old girl and a shopkeeper have been seriously injured
in a shooting at a grocery store in south London.

Police were called to reports of shots fired in Stockwell
Food and Wine shop in Stockwell Road on Tuesday night.

The man, aged 35, and the 5 year old girl where both in a
stable condition in hospital.

Police said the victims are thought to have been caught in
the firing line of a gang who were targeting two youths who were sheltering in
the shop.

Officers from Operation Trident - which focuses on gun crime
in the black community - are investigating.

The shooting happened at about 2115. And no arrests have
been made as yet?

The girl, who was visiting relatives but cannot be named as
not all her family have been informed of her injuries, was hit in the chest.

The shopkeeper, who lived above the store, was shot in the
face. The victims were not related.

Eyewitness Kirubakaran Nantheesbaran said: "One of her
family members was keeping her on his lap and he was giving pressure to her
heart because she was suddenly flat.

"She couldn't talk and she couldn't breathe but I
didn't see any blood on her body, just a small injury on her chest."

The Metropolitan Police said: "It is believed two black
youths ran into the shop shortly before the shots were fired.

"The youths had been chased from Broomgrove Road,
across Stockwell Road, and into the shop by three other black youths on
bicycles.

"Once the youths on bikes were outside the shop, one of
them fired shots into the shop front."

Det Ch Insp Tony Boughton said: "This is a terrible
incident where an innocent child has been seriously injured.

"We want to hear from the local community, who might
have seen these youths cycling around the estate between 2100 and 2200.

"These criminals have seriously injured two innocent
bystanders and must face the consequences of their actions."

He also urged the intended victims to come forward.

The parade of shops remains cordoned off and Stockwell Green
Court, an access road behind the main road, has also been sealed off.

Councillor Peter Robbins said: "It is incredibly
shocking, I think the whole community at the moment is numb and horrified, and
rightly so.

"There is a fairly well-known problem with gangs and
guns in Lambeth, it is something that the council and the police are working
together incredibly hard to solve.

"Obviously, there is always more you can do and
incidents like this really bring that home."

Barny Stutter, who co-owns nearby Brixton Cycles, said the
shopkeepers belonged to a "very tight" community.

He said: "We are absolutely disgusted with what's
happened.

"This area has recovered from a bad reputation built up
in the media but we love to live and work in the community."

He also said staff working in fast food shops in the area
were regularly hassled by youths.

As David Cameron and other British MP’s sleep safe in their
beds at night being the privileged few, there many of England’s public that are
living in fear every night and day in many towns and city across England with
gang violence.

And if this British government concentrated more on the
problems here in England rather than what going on in other counties and toughened
up laws, then thing like the above could be minor problem, rather than like now
with all crime getting out of control? Under English laws these gang would be dealt
with very severely giving out a very clear message, that it’s not going to be tolerated
in England.

Lawless England under British soft laws on gangs

Five year old little girl gets shot in Stockwell shop, while
British Prime Minister David Cameron sleeps safe in his bed at night in.

A five-year-old girl and a shopkeeper have been seriously injured
in a shooting at a grocery store in south London.

Police were called to reports of shots fired in Stockwell
Food and Wine shop in Stockwell Road on Tuesday night.

The man, aged 35, and the 5 year old girl where both in a
stable condition in hospital.

Police said the victims are thought to have been caught in
the firing line of a gang who were targeting two youths who were sheltering in
the shop.

Officers from Operation Trident - which focuses on gun crime
in the black community - are investigating.

The shooting happened at about 2115. And no arrests have
been made as yet?

The girl, who was visiting relatives but cannot be named as
not all her family have been informed of her injuries, was hit in the chest.

The shopkeeper, who lived above the store, was shot in the
face. The victims were not related.

Eyewitness Kirubakaran Nantheesbaran said: "One of her
family members was keeping her on his lap and he was giving pressure to her
heart because she was suddenly flat.

"She couldn't talk and she couldn't breathe but I
didn't see any blood on her body, just a small injury on her chest."

The Metropolitan Police said: "It is believed two black
youths ran into the shop shortly before the shots were fired.

"The youths had been chased from Broomgrove Road,
across Stockwell Road, and into the shop by three other black youths on
bicycles.

"Once the youths on bikes were outside the shop, one of
them fired shots into the shop front."

Det Ch Insp Tony Boughton said: "This is a terrible
incident where an innocent child has been seriously injured.

"We want to hear from the local community, who might
have seen these youths cycling around the estate between 2100 and 2200.

"These criminals have seriously injured two innocent
bystanders and must face the consequences of their actions."

He also urged the intended victims to come forward.

The parade of shops remains cordoned off and Stockwell Green
Court, an access road behind the main road, has also been sealed off.

Councillor Peter Robbins said: "It is incredibly
shocking, I think the whole community at the moment is numb and horrified, and
rightly so.

"There is a fairly well-known problem with gangs and
guns in Lambeth, it is something that the council and the police are working
together incredibly hard to solve.

"Obviously, there is always more you can do and
incidents like this really bring that home."

Barny Stutter, who co-owns nearby Brixton Cycles, said the
shopkeepers belonged to a "very tight" community.

He said: "We are absolutely disgusted with what's
happened.

"This area has recovered from a bad reputation built up
in the media but we love to live and work in the community."

He also said staff working in fast food shops in the area
were regularly hassled by youths.

As David Cameron and other British MP’s sleep safe in their
beds at night being the privileged few, there many of England’s public that are
living in fear every night and day in many towns and city across England with
gang violence.

And if this British government concentrated more on the
problems here in England rather than what going on in other counties and toughened
up laws, then thing like the above could be minor problem, rather than like now
with all crime getting out of control? Under English laws these gang would be dealt
with very severely giving out a very clear message, that it’s not going to be tolerated
in England.

Referendum vote: AV will boost BNP, says Tories

Conservative chairman has said changing the British voting
system to the alternative vote (AV) would mean more votes and legitimacy for
the BNP. ( And if the BNP changed its name to the English national party rather
than British” we would most certainly see English MP’s in government, the fact
that its calls its self-British loses the BNP thousands of  English votes, English voters not wanting to
be British)

She told the London Times AV could see British politicians
"pandering to extremist voters like the English and BNP voters" - but
Lib Dem peer Baroness Falkner said the No campaign was resorting to
"baseless scaremongering".

British/English voters will be asked on 5 May whether they
want to keep first-past-the-post system or switch to AV. (AV would be very favourable
to English voters)

The BNP told the London Times that it is against a switch to
AV.

The decision to hold a referendum was a key coalition deal
concession by the Conservatives - who back first-past-the-post - to the Lib
Dems, who have long campaigned to change the voting system.

Voters will be asked whether they want to change the current
system, where people put a cross by their preferred candidate, for AV, where
candidates are ranked in order of preference

In an article for the Sun newspaper, Baroness Warsi argues
that the AV system - where, if no-one gets more than 50% of first-choice votes,
the last placed candidate is eliminated and their second preferences are
redistributed - means some people have their votes counted more than others.

She says: "Too often, those people tend to be the ones
who vote for extremist parties. This means AV could see candidates pandering to
extremist voters - because to win a seat they will need to win the support of
people whose first choices have already been eliminated."

She also argued that the system risked giving parties like
the BNP "more legitimacy" because people would be able to register a
"protest vote without considering the electoral implications".

"The long-term effects of that are clear: more votes,
more power, more long-term legitimacy for the BNP and other fringe
parties," she wrote.

However the BNP says it will tell its supporters to oppose
AV. It instead backs a system known as party list proportional representation,
which is used in England, Scotland and Wales for elections to the European
Parliament - the BNP has two MEPs. (But if it changes its name by dropping the British
and putting English, it would no doubt have far more MP’s and MEP’s?)

The Yes to AV campaign said the Secretary General of the
Muslim Council of Britain and head of Operation Black Vote both agreed that
under AV, politicians would have to reach out further and secure majority
support.

The campaign's chairman Katie Ghose said: "The No
campaign can't choose their supporters, but they can't escape the fact the BNP
are campaigning for a No vote. Maybe up is down and black is white, but [BNP
leader] Nick Griffin is still saying No to AV."

And Lib Dem peer Baroness Falkner said: "I'm shocked
and frankly appalled by the distortions being spun today by Baroness Warsi and
the 'No' campaign.

"Under AV, no one can get elected unless the majority
of people support them which quite obviously makes it harder, not easier, for
extremist parties. That's exactly why the BNP are campaigning for a 'No' vote.

"The No-campaign has resorted to baseless
scaremongering because they can't make any positive case for the status quo.
People won't be fooled by this."

Earlier this week Baroness Warsi's Lib Dem coalition
colleague, Energy Secretary Chris Huhne, wrote urging her, as a patron of the
"No to AV" campaign, to stop it adopting "the politics of the
gutter" with "misleading and scaremongering advertisements".

Anti-AV posters have claimed that a yes vote would cost
£250m and deprive sick babies of treatment and soldiers of body armour.

In his letter the Energy Secretary warned that splits over
the AV referendum "should not be a source of tension between us or risk
breaking the coalition".

REFERENDUM CHOICE

At the moment MPs are elected by the first-past-the-post
system, where the candidate getting the most votes in a constituency is
elected.

On 5 May all registered UK voters will be able to vote Yes
or No on whether to change the way MPs are elected to the alternative vote system.

Under the alternative vote system, voters rank candidates in
their constituency in order of preference.

Anyone getting more than 50% of first-preference votes is
elected.

If no-one gets 50% of votes, the candidate with the fewest
votes is eliminated and their backers' second choices allocated to those
remaining.

This process continues until one candidate has at least 50%
of all votes in that round.

Cameron stand up like a man, or go you Muppet

It’s time you started to stand up like a man CAMERON and not
the EU’s Muppet  

Like every other British PM well apart from Churchill during
the wars and Thatcher who put her country first on the list not last?

David Cameron says he is "frustrated" that the British
are obliged to contribute to future bail-outs of countries using the single
currency until 2013.

Cameron said the British hands had been tied by an agreement
signed by the last British Labour government in the days after the 2010 general
election but before the coalition had been formed.

The Conservatives had strongly objected to the decision at
the time, he added.

Ex-Chancellor Alistair Darling said the PM gave a
"partial account" of events.

Both Tory and Labour MPs have expressed anger that the British
may have to give financial aid to Portugal after the country's Parliament
rejected proposed austerity measures last week and its prime minister resigned
in response. (Meaning the English tax payers giving more aid to others when
England is in desperate need of its own aid?)

British ministers have insisted that Portugal has not made
any request for external financial assistance and any speculation about what
may happen in the future is unhelpful.

Updating MPs on the outcome of Friday's European Council
summit, Cameron confirmed that the (English Tax Payers) wear liable to
contribute to an emergency support fund for EU members - including those in the
Euro-zone - in financial distress.

EU members agreed to the fund at an emergency meeting in the
first weekend of May 2010 - days after the UK general election resulted in a
hung parliament - when they also approved a £95bn loan to Greece and a separate
financial rescue fund for Euro-zone members.

Mr Darling conducted the negotiations on behalf of the British
at the meeting because coalition negotiations were still underway.

Cameron said Darling had taken the wrong decision during the
meeting in Brussels and suggested he had ignored advice given to him when he
consulted with his Conservative opposite number and successor as Chancellor
George Osborne.

"It is a decision which the chancellor specifically
objected to when it was taken by his predecessor after the election but before
this government took office," Cameron told MPs.

"Frustratingly, we are stuck with it for the duration
of the emergency mechanism."

Cameron repeated what Sir Michael Black-Feather the English
first minister had said over a year ago? He said (England) Cameron said
"Britain is not in the euro and is not going to be joining the euro so it
is right that we should not be involved in the euro area's internal
arrangements." (Sir Michael said isn’t right that English tax payers should
bailout the euro, when its nothing what so ever to do with England and never
will be without the English people voting it in, which will never happen we
want our pound, we like our pound it’s our national identity of being the
English, The Bank Of England not the bank of euro)

Cameron went on to say; "That is why I believe we should
not have any liability for bailing out the Eurozone."

But Darling said the prime minister had given a
"somewhat incomplete account" of discussions he had had with his
successor over the issue.

"We did indeed agree that we should do everything we
could to keep Britain out of the main part of the rescue fund," he told
his fellow British MPs.

But he said he had talked to Osborne about the merits of
abstaining, rather than voting against, a proposal to require all EU members to
contribute to the secondary European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism since it
was clear the British might be outvoted anyway.

"When he next refers to it perhaps he would give a
whole account and not a partial account of what happened," Darling told
the prime minister.

Cameron said his chancellor had told him that he made it
"absolutely clear" at the time that this "was not something the
British should agree to".

Cameron said he had insisted in subsequent negotiations that
the British liability should be removed when a permanent replacement fund comes
into place in two years’ time

Sir Michael said, if Cameron where a true leader of men, he
would do what I would do, and that is tell the EU to take a running jump, and
if they don’t like it lump it, what are they really going  to do without England’s support, nothing that’s
what, if England pulled out of the EU, they would be lost like little children
in the big dark woods, for far too long the jump up little euro men have been
telling me and my countrymen what we can and what we can’t do in our own
country, they have very short memories for it was England and its people they
gave them back all their countries that they had lost in both world wars? Sod’em
he said bailout your own euro mess England has its own financial messes to
clean up without adding theirs...

Libya: Backwards then forwards then backwards

Gaddafi forces push rebels back near Sirte so much for the
UN this is only going to be a couple of week’s job?

Now you see why the Americans want to have nothing to do
with Libya, they had the foresight to see this was going to be a long and drawn
out war, but the UN and Cameron don’t see it, yet where all told by Sir Michael
Black-Feather this was going to be the way things would go, who also offered a solution
to the Libya problem but the UN and the British PM Cameron although they knew
better??????

Pro-government forces have pushed rebels back from the key
Libyan town of Sirte, Muammar Gaddafi's birthplace.

The renewed fighting came as delegates from dozens of
countries were gathering in London for a conference on the future of Libya.

US President Obama earlier defended the first military
intervention of his presidency, insisting that US involvement would be limited.

But he also said overthrowing Col Gaddafi by force would be
a mistake.

Anti-Gaddafi forces had made some progress westwards from
their stronghold in Benghazi in recent days only because of the aid given by
international air strikes - seizing a number of coastal communities and
important oil installations, including Ras Lanuf, Brega, Uqayla and Bin Jawad.

But rebel fighters said pro-Gaddafi forces had used heavy
weaponry to check their advance, forcing them to retreat from the town of
Nawfaliyah, 100km (60 miles) from Sirte

A Pentagon spokesman in Washington, Vice Admiral Bill Gortney,
said that because the Libyan rebels were not well organised, any military gains
they made would be tenuous and he fully agreed with statements made by Sir
Michael’s earlier last week.

He said the rebels were clearly benefiting from actions of
the US and UN, which has started using heavily-armed low-flying aircraft
against government forces.

Meanwhile, ships from the US Sixth Fleet attacked three
Libyan ships that had been firing indiscriminately at merchant ships in the
port of Misrata, west of Sirte.

One of the vessels was destroyed and a second beached, while
the third was abandoned, US Navy officials said.

In eastern Libya, rebel radio has been urging more people in
the west of the country to join the anti-Gaddafi uprising.

NATO has denied Sir Michael’s statements that its air
strikes are meant to provide cover for a rebel advance.

Critics both on the left and right in the US and in England
are asking why their country is involved in Libya. Another war that no one wants
nor can afford to pay for in the £$ millions of pound and dollars it’s costing already,
with some of the missiles being fired costing over £500,000 each the cost estimated
to English tax payers so far is over one billion pounds and going up by the day
which could have gone towards stopping public services cut backs?.

The US President said he had ordered military intervention only
to enforce the UN resolution because if the coalition had waited one more day,
there could have been a massacre in Benghazi that would have stained the
conscience of the world, eclipsed the dawning democratic impulses across the
region and crippled the credibility of the UN.

He said he had refused to wait for images of slaughter and
mass graves before taking action.

But he also addressed the limits of action: he said there
was no question that the world would be better off with Gaddafi out of power
but to broaden military aims to regime change would splinter the coalition and
mean US troops on the ground.

But while NATO insists it is impartial in the conflict,
Russia has renewed its expressions of concern, saying intervention in an
internal civil war is not sanctioned by UN Security Council Resolution 1973.

Ahead of Tuesday's conference, British Foreign Secretary
William Hague said he wanted Col Gaddafi to leave power and face trial at the
International Criminal Court.

Some 40 delegations - from the coalition, the UN, NATO, the
African Union and Arab League, but not the Libyan government nor the English
people will be represented in London.  But rebel officials have been invited for
talks on the meeting's side-lines, although not to the conference itself.

In a letter to those attending the conference, Col Gaddafi
called for an end to the "barbaric offensive" on his country.

In his first televised address on the Libyan intervention,
Mr Obama said that having led the initial campaign - which had saved
"countless lives" - the US would pull out and  hand over to NATO allies on Wednesday.

"We have stopped Gaddafi's deadly advance," he
said at the National Defence University in Washington DC.

But the lead in enforcing the no-fly zone and protecting
civilians on the ground would now move to the Americans' allies, he added.

"We must always measure our interests against the need
for action," the president continued. "But that cannot be an argument
for never acting on behalf of what's right."

Earlier, in a video conference with French President Nicolas
Sarkozy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister David
Cameron, Mr Obama had agreed that Col Gaddafi "had lost any legitimacy to
rule and should leave power, and that the Libyan people should have the
political space to determine their own future", the White House said.

Khaled Kaim: "The solution is for all parties to be
involved in peace-making"

An Italian proposal to end the crisis includes offering Col
Gaddafi an escape route from Libya, ensuring a quick ceasefire and facilitating
dialogue between rebels and tribal leaders.

Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said he had discussed the
proposals with Germany and France.

Libyan Deputy Foreign Minister Khaled Kaim, meanwhile, has
called on those attending Tuesday's conference in London to act as
"peacemakers, not warmongers".

England to become lawless under the British government

More than 2,000 of the country's most experienced police
officers could be forced to retire by 2015 as forces try to cut costs under
British government cuts backs

Sir Michael Black-Feather the English first minister claims
that police officers that are forced to retire under this half-witted British coalition
government will result in the crime rate that is resizing, rise far higher and
in fact we should be employing far more police officers not putting them out to
grass, maybe it time to start thinking about an English county’s and town’s  police forces as like the Americans sheriff’s
department or local towns police departments, and also the renewal of the English
army that both services run under English directives not British.

Although police officers cannot be made redundant, officers
with 30 or more years' experience can be made to retire under existing
regulations.

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said it was "deeply
worrying" 13 forces had decided to use them in some form.

Ministers have said savings can be made without affecting
front-line policing which is utter rubbish with the current budget cut back on police
forces all over England we have seen all types of crime rise from anti-social driving
to drug dealing murder and rape and the list goes on and on?.

Police budgets are being cut by 20% over the next four
years, with a 4% cut in the first year and 5% the year after. But British
ministers insist these savings are achievable by cutting bureaucracy and more
efficient use of resources, including forces sharing some back-office
functions.

Fully sworn police officers are servants of the Crown, not
employees, so they cannot be made redundant under existing laws.

However, forces are able to get permission to use a
regulation known as A19 to make officers with 30 years' experience or more
retire early.

Labour said details obtained under Freedom of Information
showed 13 forces definitely intended to use this power and that 1,138 officers
either have or will be forced to retire by 2015.

Another 986 officers could also be affected, the opposition
have suggested, if other forces decided to proceed on the same basis.

"Some of these officers are the experts in their fields
and internationally respected for what they do in the fight against
crime," Ms Cooper said.

"The home secretary must realise that you cannot make
20% frontloaded cuts to the police without losing the very crime fighters we
need. The home secretary is taking unacceptable risks with public safety and
the continued fight against crime."

In November, the Home Office said 3,200 officers in England
and Wales could be affected if all forces chose to enforce the compulsory
retirement rule.

Home Office sources have said it is a matter for individual
forces how staff are managed but they believe forces should be able to identify
enough savings to ensure the budget cuts have no effect on the level of service
the public receives.

One of the officers forced to retire under the A19 rule told
BBC Radio 4's Today programme that it was a "crude tool" to reduce
staff numbers.

"I am one of the people who turn up at the front
line," said Sergeant Dave Hewitt, 48, who finishes with the West Midlands
Police on April 1 after a career spanning 32 years.

"In the West Midlands it's affecting ranks from chief
superintendent to police constable and it is affecting the top end where you've
got a lot of experience, a lot of quality officers."

West Midlands Police told the programme the decision to use
the A19 regulation had been difficult, but a spokesman said the number of
officers affected by the rule was relatively small, amounting to 649 - out of a
force of 8,500 officers - over four years.

About 95% of officers who reached 30 years' service retired
anyway, he added, and the force would ensure safeguards were in place for
succession planning and passing on key skills.

Last month, Labour said its research suggested at least
10,190 uniformed police officer posts were set to disappear by the end of next
year in England and Wales as part of cuts.

Policing minister Nick Herbert said he did not accept the
figures, adding it was the effectiveness of officers not their total numbers
that counted.

David Cameron still living in Narnia

David Cameron still living in Narnia as he says now is time
to start new business

David Cameron has told would-be entrepreneurs "now is
the time" to launch their business. (It doesn’t matter about scoring fuel
prices. Or banks won’t lend you the cash, or even that England is still in a
massive recession, or all the British government cut back and tax hikes, where
is this man living?

Cameron was backing a private-sector led initiative aimed at
helping people set up businesses.

Start-up Britain is offering support worth about £1,500 in
areas like IT training and internet advertising all the areas that aren’t really
needed? What about builders, carpenters, engineers, apprenticeships ECT, one
thing we have plenty of is IT and internet advertising.

Last week's Budget saw economic growth forecasts revised
down and ministers are looking to the private sector to drive forward growth
but giving nothing to help it but tax hypes, fuel cost scoring up, in fact petrol
and diesel has gone up in most areas after Osborne’s half-witted budget.

The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)
forecast 1.7% growth in 2011, compared with its previous estimate of the 2.1%.

At the launch of Start Up Britain, which is backed by entrepreneurs
and big business,  Cameron said Britain's
economic recovery had to be private-sector led "with made in British
stamped all over it" not English?.

Cameron said government had a role to play in easing the
burden on business - but it could only do so much on its own and it needed
business to help drive the recovery: "I believe we can make this decade
one of the most entrepreneurial decades in our history."

This government is backing small firms, it's getting behind
the start-ups, it's getting behind the doers and the grafters who are going to
get our economy moving and create the jobs and the wealth and the opportunity
that we need."

But he said none of the initiatives would matter unless
people took up the opportunities: "I want to make a direct appeal to
everyone who's sitting at home or at their desk and thinking about starting
their own business. Now is the time to do it.

(What he didn’t say is where you’re going to get the cash to
do this, as banks won’t lend you the cash, even if you’ve been in business with
good records the computer will say no?)

"If you've been turning over a good idea for years -
now is the time to make something of it. If you're working for a big firm but
you know you could do a better job on your own - now is the time to make that
leap. If you've been dreaming about starting up the next great British brand -
now is the time to make it happen.

"There are thousands of people out there who are
entrepreneurs but they just don't know it yet or they are thinking about. There
are millions of success stories that haven't been written yet. So seize this
moment. Take these opportunities. Make it happen - and together we can drive
our economy forward."

He also suggested his wife Samantha - who was creative
director at upmarket stationery firm Smythson before he became PM, might start
up her own business, when his political career is over.

"Politicians are always troubled with the question,
'what on earth do you do after politics?'," he said. (The same as you do
when in politics sod all)

"I have no doubt Samantha's answer will be pretty
clear, which will be for her to start a new business. She's always said 'if you
are going to do politics, then one of us better have a proper job'."

Start Up Britain is being supported by firms including AXA,
Barclays, Intel, Blackberry, Experian, Google, Virgin Media Microsoft, McKinsey
& Co and O2.

The launch follows last week's Budget which raised
entrepreneurial tax reliefs, created 21 enterprise zones offering tax breaks,
and promised less red tape and high speed broadband in an effort to help new
firms grow.

The announcement comes on the day that a group of leading
venture capitalists said the UK was a "world-class place to launch new
businesses", following George Osborne's Budget.

British entrepreneurs, and those relocating to the UK, will
find it easier to raise the funds they need to do what they do best: create and
grow world beating businesses," they wrote.

Mr Cameron said last week's Budget had been "the most
pro-enterprise Budget this country has seen for a generation" but Labour
argues that the government's spending cuts are damaging the economic recovery,
after growth forecasts were revised down.